Requiring Non-
To Pay Their ‘Fair Share’
When a union negotiates a contract providing increases in pay and benefits, or represents
employees before Congress and federal agencies, everyone benefits -
Fair-
The fundamental difference between enjoying full membership and paying a fair share
is that members are entitled to full benefits and participation, whereas employees
who pay a fair share are paying for services related directly to collective bargaining.
Fair-
If it passes, federal fair-
• The fees would be charged only for activities the union is required to perform for all employees under federal law;
• The fees would not be mandatory for all unionized workplaces. Fair-
• Employees would have the opportunity to challenge the amount of fees if they believed they were being charged too much;
• Fair-
• Workers would not be forced to join a union.
Funds generated by the collection of fair share fees would strengthen the union’s ability to represent all employees in the bargaining unit.
The APWU’s accomplishments have been astonishing: In addition to step increases,
promotions and upgrades, wages for APWU represented employees have increased at a
rate of 4 percent per year over the past 20 years; workers enjoy unparalleled job
security; top-
Yet despite these successes, nothing that we have done has significantly reduced the unacceptably high percentage of workers who continue to receive the benefits of union efforts but refuse to join the organization.
These efforts have cost union members millions of dollars, and benefited every USPS employee in the APWU bargaining unit.
APWU will explore every opportunity to correct this injustice to due-